According to the results of a new survey, British Columbia is Canada’s least-attractive jurisdiction for oil and gas investment. To make matters worse, B.C. ranks second-last when compared to other provinces and American states.
So what’s behind B.C.’s dismal performance in the eyes of investors?
For perspective, consider how B.C. performs compared to other medium-reserve holders. In 2019, only 12 per cent of respondents for Oklahoma indicated that uncertainty concerning environmental regulations was a deterrent to investment compared to 94 per cent for B.C. Similarly, only 13 per cent of respondents for North Dakota were deterred by this factor.
In addition, 88 per cent of respondents for B.C. identified taxation in general (personal, payroll, capital taxes, etc.) as a deterrent to investment compared to only 12 per cent for Oklahoma and 13 per cent for North Dakota. And 87 per cent of respondents cited political instability as a deterrent to investment when evaluating B.C. compared to eight per cent for Oklahoma and 10 per cent for Wyoming.
The high cost of regulatory compliance, regulatory duplication and inconsistencies and uncertainty concerning protected areas also remain major deterrents, as 80 per cent of respondents for B.C. are deterred by these factors.
Finally, 67 per cent of respondents for B.C. are deterred by uncertainty concerning disputed land claims. Disputed land claims and protected areas are also the chief concerns of mining investors in the province, which is noted in our Annual Survey of Mining Companies.
To explain B.C.’s poor performance in the survey we should examine some of the policy changes in the province in recent years. For example, the provincial government abandoned the idea of a revenue-neutral carbon tax and instead has increased various taxes including the carbon tax rate and the general business income tax rate. In addition, both the NDP and Green parties oppose the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
Overall, B.C.’s dismal performance in the eyes of oil and gas investors should concern policymakers in Victoria and Ottawa. To improve B.C.’s image, governments should focus on streamlining energy regulations and pursing competitive policies for the benefit of British Columbians and all Canadians.
Commentary
B.C. performs poorly in eyes of oil and gas investors
EST. READ TIME 2 MIN.Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
According to the results of a new survey, British Columbia is Canada’s least-attractive jurisdiction for oil and gas investment. To make matters worse, B.C. ranks second-last when compared to other provinces and American states.
So what’s behind B.C.’s dismal performance in the eyes of investors?
In the 2019 Canada-US Energy Sector Competitiveness Survey, investors point to uncertainty concerning environmental regulations, taxation and political stability as the top areas of concern in B.C.
For perspective, consider how B.C. performs compared to other medium-reserve holders. In 2019, only 12 per cent of respondents for Oklahoma indicated that uncertainty concerning environmental regulations was a deterrent to investment compared to 94 per cent for B.C. Similarly, only 13 per cent of respondents for North Dakota were deterred by this factor.
In addition, 88 per cent of respondents for B.C. identified taxation in general (personal, payroll, capital taxes, etc.) as a deterrent to investment compared to only 12 per cent for Oklahoma and 13 per cent for North Dakota. And 87 per cent of respondents cited political instability as a deterrent to investment when evaluating B.C. compared to eight per cent for Oklahoma and 10 per cent for Wyoming.
The high cost of regulatory compliance, regulatory duplication and inconsistencies and uncertainty concerning protected areas also remain major deterrents, as 80 per cent of respondents for B.C. are deterred by these factors.
Finally, 67 per cent of respondents for B.C. are deterred by uncertainty concerning disputed land claims. Disputed land claims and protected areas are also the chief concerns of mining investors in the province, which is noted in our Annual Survey of Mining Companies.
To explain B.C.’s poor performance in the survey we should examine some of the policy changes in the province in recent years. For example, the provincial government abandoned the idea of a revenue-neutral carbon tax and instead has increased various taxes including the carbon tax rate and the general business income tax rate. In addition, both the NDP and Green parties oppose the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
Overall, B.C.’s dismal performance in the eyes of oil and gas investors should concern policymakers in Victoria and Ottawa. To improve B.C.’s image, governments should focus on streamlining energy regulations and pursing competitive policies for the benefit of British Columbians and all Canadians.
Share this:
Facebook
Twitter / X
Linkedin
Ashley Stedman
STAY UP TO DATE
More on this topic
Related Articles
By: Jock Finlayson and Elmira Aliakbari
By: Tegan Hill
By: Ross McKitrick
By: Tegan Hill and Alex Whalen
STAY UP TO DATE